WP 534 Land title to the tiller. Why it’s not enough and how it’s sometimes worse / by R.J. Garcia de la Cruz

ISS MA Research Paper Award winner 2011/2012

Rosselynn Jaye Garcia de la Cruz is one of the three ISS MA Research Paper Award winners for the academic year 2010-2011. The other two award winning papers are written by Madara Silina and Saskia Widenhorn. The members of the committee looked for academic excellence in all aspects of the research. They were keen on contributions that showed new interpretations or new sources of information. Topical relevance and significance in the context of development were considered important criteria as well. Each year the ISS Thesis Prize Awarding Committee can award up to three prizes. The jury agreed that all three papers are of very high quality.

ISS Working Paper 534 by Rosselynn Jaye Garcia de la Cruz

Abstract

Mainstream adherence to land titling as a strategy to address rural poverty has gained even more sway against the backdrop of the contemporary phenomenon of large-scale farmland acquisitions, known to some as “global land grabbing”.

The orthodox narrative, embraced in toto by organisations such as the World Bank, is that formal property rights mitigate the risks of these land acquisitions and allow the poor to access the benefits of these acquisitions. This paper attempts to critically investigate this narrative by problematising the land titling–land grabbing nexus under the lens of adverse incorporation.

Situating the study in a bio-ethanol plantation in Isabela province, Philippines, the research compared two groups of small-holder farmers: one group with titles and another without titles. Initial findings show, firstly, that land titles do not neutralise the risks of adverse incorporation for farmers in highly-asymmetrical agrarian societies or protect against the market pressures that bear upon these farmers and secondly, that titles may, in fact, have a lubricating rather than insulating function—drawing title-holders into the global value chain and compromising their prospects for more equitable, pro-poor outcomes. In conclusion, the paper proposes a recasting of the land titling paradigm: viewing land titles not as apparatuses with invariant outcomes, but as contested tools for truly meaningful rights assertions.

Keywords

Land grabbing, land titling, Philippines, bio-fuels, adverse incorporation

Download the full text

About the author

Complete list of ISS Working Papers

Subscribe to our free email notification service for the ISS Working Paper Series