Revisiting ethnographic sites as an ongoing knowledge production practice

BLISS header - for news items
Feathers - Bliss
Lize Swartz

Is it important for ethnographers to revisit the sites where they conduct their research once their projects have been completed?

In this post, researcher and policy advocate Daya Sudrajat argues that the answer is both yes and no. She sees ethnography practice is an ongoing knowledge production project, as people’s perspectives and practices are always evolving.

Read the full post Revisiting ethnographic sites as an ongoing knowledge production practice

About the author

Daya Sudrajat is a researcher and policy advocate in inclusive education issues based in Jakarta, Indonesia. She has a strong interest in knowledge production in marginalized communities and this led her to write a thesis about art as alternative development practice in North Lombok, Indonesia. She holds a MA degree from ISS

 

More information

What is BlISS?

Bliss is the blog of the International Institute of Social Studies on global development and social justice. It aims to provide a space where research ideas and findings are brought to the development community in a timely way. With the blog, ISS will address different audiences in policy, practice and the public at large.

Want to receive updates on new posts? Sign up to Bliss today!

Compare @count study programme

  • @title

    • Duration: @duration
Compare study programmes